Chris christie interview

I was just watching an interview with New Jersey governor Chris christie conducted by Piers Morgan. Christie was asked a leading question about tax rates for billionaires and his answer evolved into a statement regarding Warren Buffet. "buffet should write a check to the government and shutup" was I believe how he phrased it. That is not the right answer regarding Buffets tax situation. It's really simple, every dollar that Buffet is allowed to keep is used to invest in companies with the goal of making them better and more competitive. So far, he has been extremely successful at this. On what planet would it benefit a society to take money away from the people who use it for the greater good and give it to a government that uses it in a comically inefficient way.Every time Buffet has complained about his paying too little taxes the only conclusion I can draw is that he has been so focused on creating wealth through brilliant business management that he never put much thought into the more macro picture regarding economics. Even Warren Buffet can be wrong. Oh, and forgot to mention that Buffet has committed most of his fortune to private charities on the occasion of his death. It's simple to make the argument that Buffet is taxed too much and his opinion on the subject has no greater weight than anyone else's.

notes for tuesday..follow on twitter@jimiuorio

      No longer is europe the only visible threat to the economic recovery. Now we have to worry about the wet blanket of higher oil prices to potentially slow growth. The rally in oil would be fine if its root cause was growing domestic demand. However, when the threat of supply shock takes center stage we must be very cautious. As we have spoken about in the past, im almost never short oil, at least not overnight and that's because of the obvious reason, alot can happen overnight and none of it good. If i was going to make a play in oil i would buy xom above 86 as it has recently broken out of a well defined trend triangle and could have room to run. The last thing to mention regarding oil is that we still have global central banks devaluing fiat currencies at the first sign of any trouble and that has to mean inflation at some point in time.
     Its been almost 2 months since utilities fell out of favor for no other sin than having done too well and i believe they have served their time. Tomorrow i believe  will start scaling into a long position in xlu. The fundamental argument for utilities is an attractive yield when compared to a sub 2% ten year and we buy utilities when we can think of nothing else to buy. Most of the other sectors have had sizable up moves over the last 2 months and have left them susceptible to a correction.
    As always, i like gld and will look to increase long exposure if gld trades above 168
    WARNING--the remainder of this blog post will be about politics
    According to a national poll, santorum has officially taken the top spot among republicans. Here is a message to republicans; the middle hates and is frightened by santorum and he has almost no chance of winning in the general election. It is sad when the gop cant figure this simple math out for themselves. Its a question of compromise, in this case with your own hard right ideals. Support for santorum is the same as support for obama and i guarantee that there are smiles all around the white house every time he gains steam. As a side note i kind of like santorum as president because of his conservative economic policy but that should not be part of the discussion. Electability is the key and they must be able to see past their selfish agendas. I know i didnt say anything that everybody doesn't already know, but it feels good to say it out loud...have a great night....jim

weekend outrage--be warned nothing to do with markets

     I need some help in dispute resolution. My brother and i had a half hour argument regarding the comments on contraception, made by some guy who is a major contributor to the santorum campaign. To my knowledge,this is what he said, and i paraphrase. "In my day contraception was an aspirin...women held it between their legs..." Before we continue i should make a quick confession . I ,like liberals, love to find things to be outraged and indignant about. I think its out of boredom, but it sure feels good to have a cause. Anyway, this creepy old guy, clearly over stepped normal boundaries by making an inappropriate joke about womens body parts. If we as a society want to ramp up punishments on stupid, unfunny jokes, i for one, will not oppose. That being said, its obvious that the guy was trying to say that an effective form of birth control is abstinence. Do the liberals disagree with that thesis? is abstinence ineffective or inappropriate for avoiding unwanted pregnancies. I did not major in biology, but it seems that i would agree with the general point of the creepy guy. At this point of the discussion my brother made the point that its outrageous for the republicans to place the blame of unwanted pregnancies solely on the women.  I couldn't agree more and i dont think thats what he was saying. You could easily make the point that he was saying that women are strong and have choices, one of these choices would be abstinence. At this point of the discussion i was still trying to figure out what i was supposed to be angry about. The last and most important part of the argument is that this is a person who is not, himself, running for any office so who cares what he says. I would have to think that many campaign contributors have radical viewpoints and that's what draws them into the political discussion. I think i should note here that i am not particularly religious and i have never voted for major offices based on any platform other than economic policy. If you have time i would like to know if you side with me in this discussion or my brother. You can indicate via twitter by saying "im with you" or "im with that sniveling little liberal puke paul"

greece follow @jimiuorio

   My partner just asked me, are we supposed to go home short the euro in case something breaks over the weekend? I think the short answer is yes ,i suppose we should,but its not quite the layup it once was. If you are wondering if greece is going to default all you have to do is look at the greek 1 yr and 2 yr and you should realize that the time for that speculation is pretty much over and all thats left is narrowing down the time frame. That being said the euro is slightly higher, equities are slightly higher which leads me to believe that the market is fully prepared and no longer sweats it. That seems crazy to me and i believe there should be a bit more concern regarding the unintended consequences of the default and for that reason i will remain short the euro. On a another note, my guess is that the ecb is not gonna give a penny more to greece. If they were going to, would they have really made an argument about 300 million in additional cuts? thats a rounding error of a rounding error. My gut tells me that time is being bought until the ecb can be satisfied that all the proper ring fences are put in place. That, of course, is different than actually having them in place....thoughts???

thoughts for wed follow on twitter@jimiuorio

   I  think its important to take a big step back in order to get perspective on the situation in europe. The ecb continues to go to extraordinary lengths to avoid a greek default. Greece is a tiny country with an tiny economy and based on that should be insignificant

in the global economy. The fact that it isnt insignificant, is strong evidence of the pervading weakness thats spread throughout the eurozone. So much weakness that the ecb doesnt think it could withstand a default from an economy smaller than at least 20 states in
the u.s. For these reasons i see no point to being anything but short the euro. I try to increase my shorts on big euro up days, but i suspect those days will become less prevalent going forward. That being said, i am not necessarily bearish u.s. equities but i have become very cautious and will scrutinize every down move to determine
if it is the much needed correction. I continue to increase long exposure to vxx. I usually do that by selling the etf and buying a disproportionately higher number of out of the money calls. I do this to try to combat the decay element of the etf thats due to the roll up
in the underlying futures contracts (if anyone wants a further explanation please ask).Natgas is beginning to look attractive and although i would rather cut off my thumbs than be long that pig ung i do think there are decent ways to play it in the exploration and
distribution space. I am long rgp(regency energy). Mcd bounced of a trend line and 50 day ma today and i find that encouraging so i will stay with longs there as well. For tomorrow,as i said before i am on high alert for the correction. If the sp futures stay above 1329 i
will stay reasonably confident and continue to look for good bets in individual names. But if that level gives i may get out of everything and get short.  have a great night jim

thoughts on greece

  The most alarming thing to me about the situation in europe is how the ecb,it seems, is willing to go to almost any extent to prevent a greek default. This is a tiny country who's economy is equally tiny so why does it matter so much?? The only conclusion i come to is that the ecb is absoluttely terrified of contagion risk and if the ecb is terryfied, perhaps we should be a little more terryfied as well. I still think the way to trade it is to use big up days in the euro to increase longer dated out of the money puts longs.
   The broder markets appear to be tiring as it has had a nice run. If the s+p futures trades below 1341 i will begin to get nervous and that will progress to a mild panic if the market trades below 1329. As it stands now i stay long but not adding. As iv said before i like mcd, particularly after it bounced off trend line support on friday and feels bouyant today...

volatility trade

  The vxx volatility etf appears to be a flawed instrument. The problem, as i see it, is that the etf has to constantly roll futures contracts to maintain the proper exposure to volatility, and in doing so is forced to sell cheaper, near term futures contracts to buy more expensive further out contracts. This phenomenon is consistent as long as the vix futures are in contango. Although,there is no way to avoid the resulting decay element of the etf i think there are ways to control losses and still have protection against a vol explosion. A typical trade that i would execute would be to sell 100 contracts of the vxx(currently about 27)/ buy 2 april 30 calls(for 2.60 each)/sell 1 april 23 put(collecting 1.33). Make no mistake about it, this trade is paying for insurance and is not designed to make money. the trade cost a total of $380, but if vol explodes you will end up being long 100 contracts. If the more likely scenario unfolds and we have a continued decline in vol due to the fed policies than the vxx declines and it becomes a scratch below 23.